By:
On:
In: Annette Vee
Tagged: , , , , , , ,

The English language is a tough one to master. It’s a language full of contradictions, exceptions to seemingly nonsensical rules, and confusing homophones. English Compositionists have spent decades studying how we learn to read and write it, and for most of that time, studies have focused on the language itself; using pens, pencils, and paper—or even a typewriter—little else would likely interfere with or distract from a basic writer’s journey toward mastery. Our April 5, 2021 guest on the podcast, Dr. Annette Vee, studies how writing, and the entire concept of literacy, has changed since the proliferation of digital technologies. For a student to be considered “literate” in an English Composition today, they must not only master the ins and outs of English itself—the minutia of commas, i-before-e, their/there/they’re—but also the computer or device they use to compose: the administrative and participatory tasks of their class’ Learning Management System, their word processing application, the host they send and read class-related emails through, and so much more. And as Dr. Vee points out, a student or employee who pursues a career that uses computers might also be required to learn a programing language before they are considered truly “literate” in the language of their professional world. A lot more goes into language-based literacy today than just words on a page. Dr. Vee is Associate Professor of English and Direction of the Composition Program here at the University of Pittsburgh, as well as a participant and Co-Leader of our Sawyer Seminar, originated in the fall of 2019 (And Read More

By:
On:
In: Lara Putnam
Tagged: , , , , , , , , ,

What does it really mean to do research in the digital age? We might have what seem like an easy set of answers: doing research means using Google, managing citations using organizational software like Zotero or Easy Bib, collecting and integrating quotations (we might use Endnote or Scrivener for this), accessing archives (some of which are physical, but most of which are not), and then presenting that research using a word processor. But again, what does this really mean, especially when we consider that for most of human history, research looked nothing like what I’ve just described? If a search engine does not exist, nor the Internet, neither do any of the ways we access information as it exists separately from geographic space and necessarily longer durations of time. Before such massive accumulations of digitized texts, a researcher would likely have to travel to a specific archival or fieldwork site to accrue knowledge that could only be gained in that specific way: driving to the airport, stepping on a plane, travelling to that location, and spending a significant amount of time there. But today, all of that time, money, and attention can be saved and spent on engaging with the text itself; fieldwork can be supplemented increasingly efficiently with Zoom, Skype, text and email. Our podcast guest on April 2, 2021, Dr. Lara Putnam, chatted with me about exactly how these profound and rapid changes in research methods impact our daily lives, and how we think about the world around us. Dr. Puntam is UCIS Research Read More

By:
On:
In: Lyneise Williams
Tagged: , , , ,

On March 6, Lyneise Williams, Professor of Art History at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, spoke with the Seminar about her work at the crossroads of computational archive science, art history, and material studies. Dr. Williams’ work involves analyzing visual representations of race; her book, Latin Blackness in Parisian Visual Culture, 1852-1932,  was published by Bloomsbury in 2019. In her talk with us, Dr. Williams pointed out that analyzing such visuals requires attention to reproduction, mediation, and digital surrogacy. In other words, when a reader of Williams’ book encounters an image of the 20th century Panamanian boxer Alfonso Teofilo Brown, they are not seeing the image itself—and certainly not the human depicted in the image—but, instead, a highly mediated reproduction. Certain details might be lost in translation, and the more often an image is reproduced, the more it is likely to deteriorate; thus, what we analyze is not only the image itself, but also its journey through space and time to get to our eyes. If you’ve ever watched a hilariously blurry Youtube video of something from the 1980’s you’re familiar with what’s called “generation loss” –the more copies exist from a single original, the less likely it is that you’re getting a truly representative visual. Dr. Williams’ described her ongoing difficulties with this issue, particularly as it applies to race. Most recently: when she studies microfilm scans of early-20th century newspapers, it is rare that adequate care is taken to preserve photographs within newspapers of Black subjects. While the words of the Read More

By:
On:
In: Lyneise Williams
Tagged: , , , , , , ,

In the midst of COVID-19 induced social isolation, with many institutions like museums closing their doors, digital surrogates are forced to temporarily take the place of embodied experience. While most of our distancing is temporary — for some objects, their surrogates are all we have. The weight that replicas have to bear is dependent on their function. If the original object is destroyed, through intentional or accidental means, the record of that original no longer serves as a finding aid — something that points the way to an attainable original. If our reproductions will serve in place of original objects, predicting what will be meaningful about the original is necessary, demanding, and maybe impossible. Such mindful practices are also undeniably worth it. Dr. Lyneise Williams has articulated the stakes of this issue well in, “What Computational Archival Science Can Learn from Art History and Material Culture Studies.” Why not just keep the original? Why put so much pressure on replicas? There are cases that require replicas to rise up to the task of “replacement.” Space is often an issue. Thousands of newspapers have been microfilmed, which is a much smaller and more stable form. The stability is also a key reason why originals are often not saved. Newspaper is produced cheaply, and the paper itself degrades over time. These concerns are not trivial, particularly since the housing of archival documents requires a stable environment (reminder: you shouldn’t store things you want to save in non-climate-controlled areas like basements or sheds). Sometimes it is impractical or even Read More

By:
On:
In: Edouard Machery
Tagged: , , , , ,

In a recent meeting of the Sawyer Seminar, Dr. Edouard Machery came to discuss the role of data in his work. He is a Distinguished Professor in the History and Philosophy of Science (HPS) Department at the University of Pittsburgh, and Director of the Center for Philosophy of Science. The HPS department seems to be inherently interdisciplinary, one that brings together apparently diametrically opposed methods, like statistics and philosophy. On their website, it states “Integrating Two Areas of Study: HPS supports the study of science, its nature and fundamentals, its origins, and its place in modern politics, culture, and society.” Though many, seemingly disparate skills are required for such a field, there was still interest in building a new domain, experimental philosophy. Dr. Machery engages in this area in his current research, as he states, “with a special focus on null hypothesis significance testing, external validity, and issues in statistics.” Engaging in such varied methods, and being interdisciplinary at a personal level is difficult (to say the least). If it is true what Malcolm Gladwell states, that mastery in a subject takes roughly 10,000 hours of practice, there are only so many fields of expertise one can cultivate in a lifetime. Working in a domain in which one has gained expertise also takes time. Is it like a language? Are there polyglot parallels? After acquiring four, does one get faster at accruing expertise? Many specialists were drawn to their field because of a passion for the subject, and proficiency materialized as advanced degrees, formalized proof of Read More

By:
On:
In: Safiya Noble
Tagged: , , , , , , , ,

Happy Black History Month! (originally published February 2020) by S.E. Hackney On Thursday, January 23rd, Dr. Safiya Noble spoke to an overflowing room of students, faculty, and community members about her best-selling book Algorithms of Oppression. The thesis of the book, and of Dr. Noble’s talk, is that not only racism is actually built in to the search algorithms which we use to navigate the internet, but that the big players of the internet (Google specifically) actually profit off of that racism by tokenizing the identities of people of color. It does this by associating identity phrases such as “black girls” or “phillipina” with the sites with the most streamlined (aka profitable) SEO, which is often pornography. This is a system of classification explicitly based on the centering of the white experience and and othering of Black people and other people of color. However, as Dr. Noble spoke about in her talk, tweaking a search result or two to avoid offense doesn’t actually solve a systemic problem — one where white voices are treated as the norm, and others eventually become reduced to SEO tags to be bought and sold. This idea played out recently in Barnes & Noble’s miss guided Black History Month project, where public domain books where the race of the protagonist is not specified (determined by algorithm) have new cover art created for them, depicting the characters as People of Color. Rod Faulkner, who first brought this issue to widespread attention describes it as “literary blackface,” and points out, “Slapping illustrations of Black versions Read More

By:
On:
In: Jo Guldi
Tagged: , , , ,

“The world is on fire,” is, by now, a familiar phrase. It is often used when we feel overwhelmed about escalations in geopolitics or in response to the catastrophic effects of climate change. Humanists are human, including the “digital humanists”, and the weight of crises is a reminder to making our scholarly work “count”. In Jo Guldi’s recent visit to the Sawyer Seminar, this desire to do meaningful work was a consistent topic of conversation. We have touched upon questions of making archives public in other visits, such as that of Richard Marciano in the Fall. During this most recent visit however, we spent more time discussing what it means to “democratize” information. For example, how making records “public” relates to the goal of making information more “democratic.” Personal and Professional One argument against treating publically available records as a solution to the problem of democratizing information is the fact that even available information is not guaranteed to reach the “public” or be legible to most. Fortunately, contextualizing and creating a narrative from dispersed evidence across a variety of records is a skill with which humanists are well prepared. What role does activism play in the articulation research stakes within scholarly endeavors? While scholars may also identify as activists, there is a tension between the role of an activist and that of the researcher — concerns about how enthusiasm might affect the quality of one’s work. Scholarly rigor and passion can seem at odds, particularly valuing dispassionate rationality over emotionally grounded arguments. Nevertheless, extended scholarly engagement Read More

By:
On:
In: Jo Guldi
Tagged: , ,

Jo Guldi’s first book, Roads to Power: Britain Invents the Infrastructure State, argues that Britain became an “infrastructure state” during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, a period which saw an explosion in construction of roads, along with the accompanying surveying, management, and surveillance of that construction. Guldi’s work often deals with infrastructure, and when she turns her attention away from the history of the British Empire to the digital humanities, infrastructure is at the forefront of her mind there, too. Guldi spoke at the University of Pittsburgh’s Mellon Sawyer Seminar, Information Ecosystems, on Jan. 9 and 10. She also sat down with me for an interview that is part of the podcast series, Information Ecosystems, and will be published soon. As professor of history at Southern Methodist University, Guldi teaches history classes with a few glimpses of the digital humanities, and runs the Guldi Lab, where she employs distant reading techniques to better understand historic texts. While interviewing Guldi and hearing her speak, I was struck by the way the concept of infrastructure — be it the analog infrastructure of roads and canals or the digital infrastructure underlying the Internet — recurs in her work and her thinking. She told me during the podcast interview that she considers it important that her scholarship be available online in open-access form. Many of her articles are open-access, as is her second book, The History Manifesto, co-authored with David Armitage. Like the miles and miles of roads that connected Britain in the nineteenth century, the Internet has the power to connect people and Read More

By:
On:
In: Sandra González-Bailón
Tagged: , , , , ,

“What’s going on behind the analogies”– Sandra González-Bailón Outcomes are not always intentional. We trigger anticipated and unforeseen things with our actions. The “invisible hand” is consequential, known only through its effects. Like contagion processes, our actions are enmeshed in interrelated networks. These are some of the metaphors discussed by Sandra González-Bailón in her research on metaphorical thinking, social processes, and communication structures. She engages head-on with the challenges and affordances of digital realities- using data to learn about or “decode” aspects of social life. “Analogies help make creative connections; but they can also draw pictures of the world that are too coarse-grained for any useful purpose.” (29, Decoding the Social World) Polar area diagram by Florence Nightingale published in Notes on Matters Affecting the Health, Efficiency, and Hospital Administration of the British Army and sent to Queen Victoria in 1858.  Models and metaphors are helpful for human cognition and communication, it seems unlikely that they can (or should) be avoided. The role of metaphors and other modes of abstraction are sorts of “black boxes” that are convenient for communication. We humans think with them, but they do shape our view of reality. “The language of argument is not poetic, fanciful, or rhetorical; it is literal. We talk about arguments that way because we conceive of them that way — and we act according to the way we conceive of things.” (pg. 5, Lakoff & Johnson’s Metaphors We Live By) Perhaps other metaphors might be more productive — other models may work better than their forerunners. Read More

By:
On:
In: Matthew Jones
Tagged: , , , , , , ,

Who lets math organize their life? Drawing of the top view of the Pascaline and overview its mechanism, 1779, Oeuvres de Blaise Pascal. “…technical practices in mathematics and philosophy in turn offered important tools for cultivating truer forms of spiritual and mental nobility. These practices enabled mathematics and natural philosophy to transform, discipline, and train the intellect, the senses, and the affects, and they put these trained faculties at the heart of organizing one’s life.” (PG9-Good Life Scientific Revolution) On October 9th, 2019, Dr. Matthew Jones, visited the Mellon Sawyer Seminar group to discuss how his work in the history of science and technology relates to, makes use of, and critically examines “data” and its artefacts. Themes of collaboration and ethics are two threads that run throughout Dr. Jones’ work, though these terms take on radically different meanings as a result of shifting socio-temporal contexts. His work covers an expansive time period, ranging from early modern inventions to contemporary concerns about digital privacy and surveillance. The social nature of knowledge production and innovation were woven throughout our conversations with Dr. Jones. Highlighting collaborations between artisans and inventors in the mechanization of calculation (rather than narratives about exceptional individuals) is representative of a broader shift in historical study. Scholars from many fields have been moving away from the figure of the individual genius towards recognizing a more complicated and collaborative model of innovation. Similar reconceptions are happening within the contemporary discipline of digital humanities, as scholars strive to repatriate the credit for early experiments with computing to Read More